The New York Times has accused me of writing Q’s posts. Its main argument is technological: using software techniques to determine authorship and the unique fingerprint of a writer, two different teams have determined that I wrote the original Q posts. I won’t get into the arguments for the physical evidence that I cannot be Q - that is a book length discussion which you can read for yourself
Sue them for defamation (you know who this is haha). That way, you can reveal all their real reasoning for going after you when it hits discovery. They just gave you legal standing to expose their real motives and bring them to light.
Sue them for defamation (you know who this is haha). I say go after them, sue them, let discovery reveal the real reason they're going after you. They just gave you legal standing to go after them for launching attacks at you, to bring their crimes to light.
Sue them for defamation (you know who this is haha). That way, you can reveal all their real reasoning for going after you when it hits discovery. They just gave you legal standing to expose their real motives and bring them to light.
Sue them for defamation (you know who this is haha). I say go after them, sue them, let discovery reveal the real reason they're going after you. They just gave you legal standing to go after them for launching attacks at you, to bring their crimes to light.